In order to prevent people from moving from state to state for the sole purpose of picking a state with laws more favorable to them, i.e., "forum shopping," New York requires that a plaintiff establish a sufficient connection to the State of New York in order to commence a matrimonial proceeding in New York. Proving this connection to New York is commonly referred as establishing "residency."
Residency can be met by proving that:
- The parties were married in New York, and either party is a resident of New York when the action is commenced and has been such a resident for a continuous period of one year immediately prior to commencement proceeding, or
- The parties have resided in New York as a married couple, and either party is a resident of New York when the action is commenced and has been such a resident for a continuous period of one year immediately prior to commencement of the proceeding, or
- The grounds for the action occurred in New York, and either party has been a resident of New York for a continuous period of one year immediately prior to commencement of the proceeding, or
- The grounds for the action occurred in New York, and both parties are residents of New York at commencement of the proceeding, or
- Either party has been a resident of New York for a continuous period of at least two years immediately prior to the commencement of the proceeding .
DRL § 230.
This then begs the question, who is a "resident" of New York?
Prior to 1976, the term "resident" meant "domiciliary"; however, after an amendment to DRL § 231, "resident" has been regularly interpreted to mean either "domiciliary" or "physical resident." Guedes v. Guedes, 45 A.D.3d 533 (2d Dept. 2007).
So, who is a domiciliary? Who is a physical resident?
A domiciliary of New York is a person whose "domicile" is located within New York. "A person can have but one domicile at any given time. Every one acquires a domicile of origin at birth, which continues until effectively changed." In re Sorrentino's Will, 71 N.Y.S.2d (Surrogate's Ct., King's Cty. 1946). "In order to effect a change [of domicile] there must have been proof that the [individual] had freely chosen another domicile and that this choice was followed by physical presence at a dwelling place and the intention to make it a home" In re Johnson's Will, 259 A.D. 290 (2d Dept. 1940). Thus, to change a domicile, their must be both physical presence at the new domicile and an intent to make that place their permanent residence.
Prior to 1976, the term "resident" meant "domiciliary"; however, after an amendment to DRL § 231, "resident" has been regularly interpreted to mean either "domiciliary" or "physical resident." Guedes v. Guedes, 45 A.D.3d 533 (2d Dept. 2007).
So, who is a domiciliary? Who is a physical resident?
A domiciliary of New York is a person whose "domicile" is located within New York. "A person can have but one domicile at any given time. Every one acquires a domicile of origin at birth, which continues until effectively changed." In re Sorrentino's Will, 71 N.Y.S.2d (Surrogate's Ct., King's Cty. 1946). "In order to effect a change [of domicile] there must have been proof that the [individual] had freely chosen another domicile and that this choice was followed by physical presence at a dwelling place and the intention to make it a home" In re Johnson's Will, 259 A.D. 290 (2d Dept. 1940). Thus, to change a domicile, their must be both physical presence at the new domicile and an intent to make that place their permanent residence.
Whether a person is a physical resident "depends upon whether he [or she] has a significant connection with some locality
in the State as the result of living there for some length of time
during the course of a year.” Wittich v. Wittich, 210 A.D.2d 138 (1st Dept. 1994) (quotations and citations omitted). This can be a rather complicated issue and will involve a weighing of many facts.
For help determining whether residency has been satisfied in your case, feel free to email me at cjudge@melvinlaw.com, or call at (315) 422-1311, ext. 113.
Christopher M. Judge, Esq.
Christopher M. Judge, Esq.
No comments:
Post a Comment